Key takeaways
-
Reuters estimates Trump-linked ventures earned $802 million in crypto in early 2025.
-
Earnings got here from WLFI tokens, the TRUMP coin and USD1 stablecoin yields.
-
Alt5 Sigma’s deal and international patrons helped flip token worth into money.
-
As US crypto enforcement eased, specialists famous potential battle considerations.
Within the first half of 2025, Trump-linked ventures booked roughly $802 million in crypto revenue, primarily from World Liberty Monetary (WLFI) token gross sales and the Official Trump (TRUMP) memecoin, dwarfing income from golf, licensing and actual property.
Reuters’ investigation and methodology papers element the place the money got here from and the way it was tallied. This information explains the mechanics, the patrons and the coverage context with out the hype.
What’s World Liberty Monetary?
WLFI launched in late 2024 as a token-centric venture tied to the Trump household. Its governance token, WLFI, gives restricted holder rights in contrast with conventional decentralized finance (DeFi) governance fashions. The corporate’s lawyer argues that the token has “actual utility.”
The core monetization mannequin is simple. A Trump Group affiliate is entitled to 75% of token-sale income after bills, in accordance with WLFI’s “Gold Paper.” Reuters used this doc as the idea for its revenue mannequin.
Within the first half of 2025, Reuters estimates that WLFI token gross sales had been the one largest money contributor. They accounted for the majority of the household’s crypto windfall.
The Alt5 Sigma deal
In August 2025, WLFI marked a Nasdaq deal wherein Alt5 Sigma raised lots of of thousands and thousands of {dollars} to buy WLFI tokens. The transfer supplied a significant demand catalyst and transformed a portion of on-paper worth into realized money for Trump-controlled entities.
Separate reporting in August outlined a broader plan for a $1.5-billion WLFI “treasury” technique linked to Alt5. The plan aimed to carry a good portion of the token provide, particulars that assist clarify the dimensions of flows into WLFI.
How the TRUMP memecoin generated money
The TRUMP coin launched on Jan. 17, 2025, and its creators earned a share of the buying and selling charges from Meteora, the trade the place it first traded. Inside two weeks, onchain forensics companies cited by Reuters estimated between $86 million and $100 million in charges, totally on Meteora.
In its evaluation of the primary half of 2025, the outlet modeled roughly $672 million in coin gross sales and, utilizing a conservative 50% share assumption, attributed round $336 million to Trump-linked pursuits. The methodology acknowledges uncertainty as a result of possession and price splits will not be absolutely disclosed.
Who purchased the tokens?
Most WLFI patrons are pseudonymous pockets addresses, however the investigation recognized a number of high-profile individuals and concentrated international demand. The investigation highlights the Aqua1 Basis’s $100-million WLFI buy and studies that Eric Trump and Donald Trump Jr. participated in a worldwide investor roadshow selling the token.
The evaluation additionally notes that identifiable main patrons embody abroad traders. Whereas attribution stays probabilistic, international participation amongst giant WLFI holders seems vital.
The USD1 stablecoin (and its curiosity stream)
WLFI additionally promotes USD1, a dollar-pegged stablecoin backed by reserves in money and US Treasurys, with custody dealt with by BitGo.
Reuters studies that the reserves backing USD1 generate an estimated $80 million annual curiosity run fee at prevailing yields and notes {that a} portion of that curiosity accrues to an organization 38%-owned by the Trump Group, although the precise realized quantity for 2025 stays unspecified.
In Could 2025, Abu Dhabi-backed MGX introduced a $2-billion funding in Binance, which, in accordance with studies and public statements by WLFI, was set to be settled utilizing USD1. The deal stands as a marquee instance of how WLFI’s stablecoin is positioned to facilitate very giant transactions.
How Reuters acquired to “$802 million”
As a result of a lot of the Trump enterprise empire is non-public, Reuters mixed presidential disclosures, property information, court-released financials and onchain commerce knowledge. It then utilized express assumptions, reminiscent of WLFI’s 75% income share for WLFI token gross sales and a 50% share on TRUMP, which had been reviewed by teachers and authorized public accountants.
The outlet’s conclusion was that just about $802 million of the Trump household’s revenue within the first half of 2025 got here from crypto ventures, in contrast with simply $62 million from their conventional companies.
Do you know? WLFI disputes components of Reuters’ evaluation, arguing that its income mannequin was oversimplified, pockets knowledge misinterpreted and the venture’s real-world utility ignored.
The coverage backdrop (and the battle query)
Since January 2025, the US enforcement posture towards crypto has shifted. The Justice Division disbanded its Nationwide Cryptocurrency Enforcement Group and narrowed its priorities, whereas the US Securities and Change Fee dropped or paused a number of high-profile circumstances, together with its movement to dismiss Coinbase and the termination of actions in opposition to different main companies.
Ethics specialists instructed Reuters {that a} sitting president overseeing crypto coverage whereas his household earns substantial crypto revenue presents a novel battle of curiosity, even when it’s not illegal.
The White Home and firm representatives have denied any wrongdoing.
Findings and broader context
Briefly, what seems to be an $800-million “gold rush” is, beneath the floor, a mix of brand-driven token gross sales, fee-rich memecoin mechanics, a high-velocity treasury deal and a yield-bearing stablecoin.
The totals are drawn from documented splits and modeled flows. The controversy, nevertheless, facilities on who the patrons had been, how clear the ventures stay, and the way US coverage shifted as the cash flowed in. For anybody monitoring crypto politics, this story now serves as a stay case examine in incentives, disclosure and governance danger.
This text doesn’t comprise funding recommendation or suggestions. Each funding and buying and selling transfer entails danger, and readers ought to conduct their very own analysis when making a choice.
